• 全部
  • 经验案例
  • 典型配置
  • 技术公告
  • FAQ
  • 漏洞说明
  • 全部
  • 全部
  • 大数据引擎
  • 知了引擎
产品线
搜索
取消
案例类型
发布者
是否解决
是否官方
时间
搜索引擎
匹配模式
高级搜索

An unsuccessful case of using security policy to block access to a domain name

2020-09-22 Published
  • 0关注
  • 0收藏 1590浏览
周天 五段
粉丝:0人 关注:0人

Network Topology

Not involved

Problem Description

A local customer configures a domain name-based address object group and then blocks access to the address in security policy. The test failed.

Process Analysis

The test found that the address that the terminal accesses to the domain name resolved is different from the IP address that the domain name resolved on the firewall. If the security policy of the domain name is configured on the firewall, the firewall sends a DNS request to the DNS server to get the IP address of the domain name and save it.Then the security policy transforms the domain name-based policy into an IP address-based policy, followed by a common IP-based security policy match.That is, access control is achieved by releasing or blocking this IP address.When DNS table entries on the firewall age, the firewall re-initiates DNS queries, re-saves DNS table entries, and refreshes security policies.

The firewall did not block access to the domain name because the address resolved by the terminal accessing the domain name was different from the IP address resolved by the firewall.

If a domain name-based object group is configured, the DNS host table entry appears on the firewall immediately, which is the address that the firewall itself requests from the DNS server. The aging time is determined by the aging time (TTL) that the DNS response returned by the DNS server carries.

[H3C]display dns host                                           

Type:                                                                          

  D: Dynamic    S: Static                                                       

                                                                                

Total number: 1                                                                

No.  Host name               Type  TTL        Query type  IP addresses         

1    ***.***         D     44         A           115.238.190.238


For example, configuring security policies to prohibit access ***.***, users are accessing ***.***. When a DNS request is sent to the DNS server, the DNS resolved address (for example, 115.238.190.238) is obtained, and then the access to address 115.238.190.238 is blocked by the firewall.

Solution

It is recommended that both the intranet PC and the firewall have the same DNS server address. Otherwise, the same domain name may resolve out different addresses, affecting policy matching, or the intranet PC may point the DNS to the firewall, which acts as a DNS proxy.

该案例对您是否有帮助:

您的评价:1

若您有关于案例的建议,请反馈:

0 comments

No comments

Add Comments:

举报

×

侵犯我的权益 >
对根叔知了社区有害的内容 >
辱骂、歧视、挑衅等(不友善)

侵犯我的权益

×

泄露了我的隐私 >
侵犯了我企业的权益 >
抄袭了我的内容 >
诽谤我 >
辱骂、歧视、挑衅等(不友善)
骚扰我

泄露了我的隐私

×

您好,当您发现根叔知了上有泄漏您隐私的内容时,您可以向根叔知了进行举报。 请您把以下内容通过邮件发送到zhiliao@h3c.com 邮箱,我们会尽快处理。
  • 1. 您认为哪些内容泄露了您的隐私?(请在邮件中列出您举报的内容、链接地址,并给出简短的说明)
  • 2. 您是谁?(身份证明材料,可以是身份证或护照等证件)

侵犯了我企业的权益

×

您好,当您发现根叔知了上有关于您企业的造谣与诽谤、商业侵权等内容时,您可以向根叔知了进行举报。 请您把以下内容通过邮件发送到 zhiliao@h3c.com 邮箱,我们会在审核后尽快给您答复。
  • 1. 您举报的内容是什么?(请在邮件中列出您举报的内容和链接地址)
  • 2. 您是谁?(身份证明材料,可以是身份证或护照等证件)
  • 3. 是哪家企业?(营业执照,单位登记证明等证件)
  • 4. 您与该企业的关系是?(您是企业法人或被授权人,需提供企业委托授权书)
我们认为知名企业应该坦然接受公众讨论,对于答案中不准确的部分,我们欢迎您以正式或非正式身份在根叔知了上进行澄清。

抄袭了我的内容

×

原文链接或出处

诽谤我

×

您好,当您发现根叔知了上有诽谤您的内容时,您可以向根叔知了进行举报。 请您把以下内容通过邮件发送到zhiliao@h3c.com 邮箱,我们会尽快处理。
  • 1. 您举报的内容以及侵犯了您什么权益?(请在邮件中列出您举报的内容、链接地址,并给出简短的说明)
  • 2. 您是谁?(身份证明材料,可以是身份证或护照等证件)
我们认为知名企业应该坦然接受公众讨论,对于答案中不准确的部分,我们欢迎您以正式或非正式身份在根叔知了上进行澄清。

对根叔知了社区有害的内容

×

垃圾广告信息
色情、暴力、血腥等违反法律法规的内容
政治敏感
不规范转载 >
辱骂、歧视、挑衅等(不友善)
骚扰我
诱导投票

不规范转载

×

举报说明

提出建议

    +

亲~登录后才可以操作哦!

确定

亲~检测到您登陆的账号未在http://hclhub.h3c.com进行注册

注册后可访问此模块

跳转hclhub

你的邮箱还未认证,请认证邮箱或绑定手机后进行当前操作